Targeting Proceeds Of Crime To Reduce Crime
Money is the root of everything in today's society, which includes facilitating the whole crime industry. It is difficult to gauge the true size of the criminal problem, but it is true to say that the associated finances must be pretty large. Different sectors of the community see different problems, and sometimes criminal activity in certain sectors does not get recorded as fully as others.
Some criminal acts do not involve money. These include "crimes of passion" such as murder or rape. Unsociable problems such as mindless acts of vandalism or revenge may have a financial impact on the victims. Often they are caused by poverty. In these such cases however the financial resources within the criminal system are not impacted.
Wrongdoing like this on the other hand is mostly financially motivated in some way. Selling illegal drugs, people trafficking or organised extortion - are all examples of big business that is conducted by organised criminals for huge amounts of money. Money like this forms illegitimate proceeds of crime that is difficult to just spend. Spending the proceeds immediately is not an option as this would provide some easy evidence for the authorities to follow. The solution is to clean the money by the "laundering" process to cover its illegitimate sources. The growth in crime was accompanied by equal growth in the need for cleaning the spoils.
Having cleaned the money, the top crooks were able to afford luxury lifestyles involving big yachts, huge mansions and fast cars. They were able to sit back and smile at the authorities, safe in the knowledge that any scrutiny of their wealth would not show it had been obtained from illegitimate sources.
The regulators have always been able to take the specific profits of their offences from convicted offenders. But in an attempt to counter gang leaders that for a long time were thought to be beyond the legal process, powers have been extended in the last decade or so to combat this.
Now, just about anybody seen to have the trappings of wealth can be prosecuted under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Now it is the criminals who must prove where their source of wealth came from. Therefore, if a known crook is asked to explain the sources of all his wealth and assets he is in trouble if he is unable to show the exact point everything was earned. It may be the case that he has moved his funds around so that the illegal source is hidden, but if he then can't show how the funds were earned, gifted or won somehow he will be liable for tax on them as profits, together with interest and penalties that will coincidentally add up to as much as the amount in question!
The new regime has been successful in bringing some otherwise unreachable villains to justice. It has hit them where it hurts, in their pockets. Now the trouble is that the new powers are used too widely on the smaller frauds and tax evasions - large and small. The result is that more often than not the legislation is applied too harshly to those that are simply caught up in its meshes on a technicality. In this case, it adds a further level of importance to the criminal defence framework that must exist to temper the authorities' sometimes overzealous approach.
About the Author
Mark Jenner is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, a Certified Fraud Examiner and has a Masters Degree in Fraud Management. He advises businesses and individuals about the problems of fraud =>http://www.mark-jenner.com
Tell others about
this page:
Comments? Questions? Email Here