Reject All Alternatives to the Constitutional Equal Parental Rights Law (CEPR Law)

---

Present family court law supported by the divorce and domestic violence industry virtually guarantees that one parent - overwhelmingly a fit father - will be disenfranchised of his children and all other of his fundamental rights while the mother is enfranchised and privileged at his - and the children's - expense. Implementing the CEPR Law and rejecting present family court-based fixes is the only way to guarantee the equal and constitutional liberty interests of both parents.

Parenting implies the care, companionship, and direct support - financially or otherwise - of one's children. It's a fundamental right - one of the unalienable rights which our government was formed to secure for each of us. It is the basic function of the family, the fundamental social unit of society and generates one of if not the most meaningful relations of a person's life.

The CEPR Law ensures a father's and mother's right to parent his or her children after a divorce or paternity suit which is prevented now, especially for fathers. In fact present law not only prevents a father from parenting his children but enslaves him to the state and to the mother. This is clearly morally wrong and certainly unconstitutional.

*The Constitutional Equal Parental Rights Law (CEPR Law) essential points:

The 'demanded' Constitutional Equal Parental Rights Law (CEPR Law) asserts that two fit parents each have the constitutional and unalienable right to parent their children under divorce or paternity suits equally and that the state may not interfere with their agreement or the default arrangement nor may it impose any child-related payment obligations on either parent. The best interest of the child resides in the fit parent - not the state.

The law's main provision is that 'under a no agreement default, both fit parents under a 50/50 arrangement will either share legal and physical custody or alternate full legal and physical custody. Otherwise, any agreement of the two fit parents will not be interfered with by the state.' Additional provisions of CEPR law that make it operational are explained elsewhere.

*The divorce and domestic violence industry profits by enslaving fathers:

The present family court system run by the divorce and domestic violence industry (DDVI) won't allow such equality in parental rights. There's no money in having it and it's certainly contrary to the feminist agenda of guaranteeing women-favored outcomes and ultimately a matriarchal-based society as is being engineered now through the family court.

Nowhere has the interference in the rights of people - most especially fathers and the children - been so denied as under the family court system where family destruction and the enslavement of fathers is the rule while rewarding mothers for their help in this destruction.

Under the greater good excuses of 'best interest of the child' and 'safety of women' an enormous and profitable divorce and domestic violence industry (DDVI) has exploded over these last 40 years by denying the constitutional rights of fathers and other men without the constitutionally required due process to do so.

This DDVI is a feminist-instigated and maintained industry that operationally creates mother-headed families divorced of fathers yet living off their enslavement. Fathers are ordered to endless and onerous child support payments to mothers for whatever a mother wishes to use them for without any significant rights to parent their own children.

*Reject the family court's and the DDVI's Orwellian Newspeak:

It is important that fathers understand that the DDVI has created an Orwellian 'word box' to restrict the thoughts that fathers and the public use to understand the present tyrannical system against fathers. Fathers and the public must learn to think and speak outside the DDVI word box. Let's consider some words that are used to emotionally distort the arguments against fathers.

The family court's term 'child support' is simply a lie. We've made it clear that the correct term is child extortion. Fathers should say they refuse to pay child extortion but demand to parent (including supporting) their children directly as is their fundamental right.

The family court's and revenue agencies' 'responsible fatherhood' implies that a father should simply pay his child extortion without objecting to his enslaved status. 'Do the right thing' carries the same connotation.

But truly responsible fathers who do the right thing are those that fight this tyranny to claim their rights to parent their children which simultaneously enforces the right of his children to be parented by their father - and mother.

*Fathers must reject any demands that allows the family court discretion to abridge the rights of either fit parent:

Fathers rights groups often try to appease the powerful DDVI by offering alternative options to the CEPR law that may allow fathers more parenting input. This is foolish since any such alternative option validates the present tyrannical family court system.

The problem is that the family court and the DDVI want to abridge fathers rights. So, any solution to the present tyranny must be completely constitutional and eliminate governmental interference in the lives of citizens - including divorced and never-married parents. Otherwise this tyranny will justify its interference with its phony greater good excuses.

-Fathers must reject any option that includes:

1. State-imposed child extortion payments at any level of payment

2. State-imposed visitation is unacceptable at any level

3. Present DDVI propaganda that requires that a child should only have one home

4. Propaganda that responsible fathers should pay child extortion

5. Propaganda that fit fathers need training to be fathers

6. And any compromise that validates this tyranny's control over rights and is in conflict with maxims of law and constitution due process guarantees.

Fighting against this family court tyranny will dry up 95% of the litigation and the divorce and domestic violence industry which lobbies and feeds off the destruction of fathers, families, and freedom. It will allow fathers to create a family legacy of wealth and honor for the improvement of their progeny - a result that is being severely undermined under the present tyranny.

What could be a better legacy of a father than to preserve and protect his children from tyranny?

---

---

Comments? Questions? Email Here

© HowtoAdvice.com